What was said: thanks to those who have stepped forward to stop hate against diversity, who are helpgin to take legal action against cyber bullies ..such as those identified as 'clones'..stalkers and predators online.
(fyi) clones; the use of slanderous screen names used to target a victim..it should be noted that online abuse may also include the circulation emails;logged and altered chat; Im's that are also altered and also the profile of the clone is sometimes used to direct inflammatory and abusive remarks at the intended victim of the assault. clones are an on going problem online and may be used as criminal intent evidence against the abuser.
....please continue to forward all emails and IM's recieved or circulated by others or directly from clones, stalkers or predators....
continued committment will assist in bringing a stop to the cowardly assaults online.......and btw...while news articles about Lori Drew's and Megan Meier, speak of a teen who commited suicide over the abuse...please NOTE ;Lori Drew is a 49 year old "ADULT" who is charged with the criminal violations online......however it is categorized....it is 'morally' and 'legally' wrong as news articles reveal..
and for those of you who encourage this abuse..you are helping circulate the 'evidence' be aware, you have made a 'informed choice to do so'...or think its fun..."feed the Baboon and Watch it Spit" "it is always best to allow the perpatrator to feel like it is 'safe' in its pursuit of criminal activities over a distinct amount of time online...this allows for authorities to build a defense and collect the necessary incriminating evidence of the truth..which can come in the form of emails...Im's...ITP addresses and real time activities of the cyber stalker and bully ....those leads eventually reveal the thread of truth in the mass of information..from that...all will be held accountable"
*volunteer task force for stopping online predators...September 2008.
What's wrong with what was said: First of all, there is no such definition of a screen name - obviously this person needs to read up a bit more. Second, attorueys know that forwarded correspondence is easily altered so they do NOT rely on such material. Third, there is no information on line or otherwise that states anything about "clones" and online problems. Apparently this person has created their own legal delusion. Fourth, cyberbullying according to all information available MUST involve a person under the age of 18. Fifth, the expression "feed the Baboon and Watch it Spit" is in an of itself cyberbullying as this person is trying to define the act. Sixth, the person states that authorites "build a defense" against a "perpatrator". Obviously this person is not a lawyer or this person would know that authorites do NOT build a defense for someone they are trying to prosecute (besides the fact that prepetrator is misspelled).
I could go on about the misinformation in this person's rant but needless to say, this person doesn't have a clue what they are talking about and is NOT an attorney and therefore should NOT be giving legal advice - especially in an online format where it's easy to document the person's errors.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment